According to RAND Drug Policy Research Center, illegal drugs are a $60 billion per day industry which is patronized by at least 16 million Americans. Because of the level of usage of drugs among the American population the public has consistently considered that it should be one of its priority concerns. In view of such concerns, the United States government had made it a policy to prohibit the production, distribution and consumption of illegal drugs. The United States government had been involved in the campaign against drugs. It had become a policy of the United States government to prohibit the use and possession of cocaine, heroin marijuana, and other substances. Massive information campaign was launched about the dangers of the use of illegal drugs and efforts were made to encourage drug users to seek treatment and rehabilitation. To ensure that the policy will be strictly enforced, the government made sure that the source of illegal drugs will be eradicated. As a result, the campaign against illegal drugs extended to eradication of crops like coca, arrest of smugglers, incarceration of drug dealers, and disruption of street markets.
In the process, it had also spent billions of dollars in seeking to make America a “drug-free” country. It had also sent hundreds of thousands of Americans who have been in the possession of drugs or in the act of using drugs. However, the policy did not have significant impact on curtailing the use of drugs among the American population. In fact, it had not created any impact at all aside from increasing the value of the illegal drugs in the black market. As a result, many Americans criticized the policy to have done more harm than good to the public. I believe that America will never be a drug-free country. In fact, no country in the world, or even a city in the world, will be drug-free. The goal of the war on drugs which is to make the United States a drug-free country is just an impossible goal to achieve. This is one of the reasons why the war on drugs policy is a failure. By setting an unrealistic goal, the government had exposed itself to being a failure even at the time the policy was created. This data was created by Essay Writers.
I also believe that the use of the word “war” in the government policy of controlling the use of drugs is just not apt. It is a word that is too violent and deviates from the efforts of the government to rehabilitate and treat the users of illegal drugs. I am in favor of the current policy of de-criminalizing the use of drugs. I believe that the focus should be on the rehabilitation and treatment of drug users. When the focus is on the demand side then there will be a significant impact on the supply side. For example, if the demand for illegal drugs is low it will follow that individuals supplying drugs will be out of job. On the contrary focusing only on the supply of drugs will not have effect on reducing the supply because the suppliers will continue to find a way to sell drugs if the demand will remain high. However, by treating the drug users the government reduces the demand for drugs in the process. This is a free essay on the war on drugs policy. We are the leading provider of affordable essay writing services. BUY ESSAY ON WAR ON DRUGS POLICY NOW!
In his work on logic and argument, The Uses of Argument, Stephen Toulmin indicates three major, necessary parts of an argument, along with three additional, optional parts. The three major parts are the claim, the support, and the warrants. Claim: This is the main point, the thesis, the controlling idea. The claim may be directly stated (usually at the first of a text, but sometimes at the end, especially for effect) or the claim may be implied. Support: These are the reasons given in support of the claim; they are also known as evidence, proof, data, arguments, or grounds. The support of a claim can come in the form of facts and statistics, expert opinion, examples, explanations, and logical reasoning. Warrants: These are the assumptions or presuppositions underlying the argument. Warrants are generally accepted beliefs and values, common ways our culture or society views things; because they are so commonplace, warrants are almost always unstated and implied.
The author and audience may either share these beliefs, or the author’s warrants may be in conflict with audience’s generally held beliefs and cultural norms and values. Warrants are important because they are the "common ground" of author and audience; shared warrants invite the audience to participate by unconsciously supplying part of the argument. Warrants are also important because they provide the underlying reasons linking the claim and the support. Universities should reinstate affirmative action admissions policies. Affirmative action provides equal access to education for all ethnic groups. Equality of access is a basic American value. In this example, the claim that universities should reinstate affirmative action policies is supported by the reason that affirmative action provides equal access for all ethnic groups. It’s generally acknowledged by most Americans that equality of access is a basic American value. There are best argumentative essay to Toulmin’s model of argument. Not every one of these is used in every argument, but only as need arises. Qualifiers: Because argument is about probability and possibility, not about certainty, you should not use superlatives like all, every, absolutely or never, none, no one.
According to RAND Drug Policy Research Center, illegal drugs are a $60 billion per day industry which is patronized by at least 16 million Americans. Because of the level of usage of drugs among the American population the public has consistently considered that it should be one of its priority concerns. In view of such concerns, the United States government had made it a policy to prohibit the production, distribution and consumption of illegal drugs. The United States government had been involved in the campaign against drugs. It had become a policy of the United States government to prohibit the use and possession of cocaine, heroin marijuana, and other substances. Massive information campaign was launched about the dangers of the use of illegal drugs and efforts were made to encourage drug users to seek treatment and rehabilitation. To ensure that the policy will be strictly enforced, the government made sure that the source of illegal drugs will be eradicated. As a result, the campaign against illegal drugs extended to eradication of crops like coca, arrest of smugglers, incarceration of drug dealers, and disruption of street markets.